language, self, and politics
ok im gonna merge 'language and self' with 'language, self, and politics'
Newspeak is the official language in Oceania, but Oldspeak (the language we are using right now) is commonly accepted everywhere. why has there been a change? so that the party remains in power. how so??
in newspeak, words are broken down to their essentials, so if you are enraged, you wouldnt be enraged, you would be doubleplusangry. other words like crimestop, thoughtcrime, facecrime, unpersons, are newspeak words. these words contain only the root of the word with nothing flowerly, only suffixes and prefixes. which means that one's vocabulary is smaller, so they know less words. with less words, they are unable to accurately convey their feelings to others, and therefore, people are less close to one another.
but what's the importance? feelings are not dependant on words. true. but our minds are. we think with language. when language has been reduced to a mere 50 words, we wouldnt be able to think more than 50 words. with such simple language, people's minds will be simple, they would think simple things. they wouldnt have the capability to think deep. they would not be able to think on issues that we should be thinking about, like the importance of our life in the world. when people can't think for themselves, they jus accept what is given to them, thus making it easy for the party to remain in power.
one word which interests me is doublethink. its meaning and use has been explained throughout the book, but what i am interested in, is that people know this word doublethink, they use it, yet they are not aware that they are using it somehow. how can they use a word they are not aware of. and if they are aware, then why do they not realise that they are being played with?
in any society, language is very important. it trains the way the society thinks, it is a form of communication, and it is a form of art. by manipulating language, the Party is able to control people's minds. it is almost like reprogramming one's brains, so that everyone is robotic. (but there may still be hope, if you have seen i-robot)hehe!
when there are robots, there is no individuality, and again, no freedom.
PS i left this part out: Ampleforth says "there is only one offence, is there not?" when questioned about his offence. this one offence, i believe, is being unorthodox. in a totalitarian government, the will accept anything except unorthodoxy.
